because of the fallout tracks, if you remember back to some of the patterns that we had previously shown. Now, I will be speaking a little bit later in terms of future plans on some work we plan to do within the state according to the recommendations you gave us last May. There are some reconfirmatory spots that you were CHAIRMAN MOSELEY: going to look at. MR. “CHURCH:Yes. DR. MALIK: I'11 go into a little more detail then, later on. Was there any attempt to sample in the same places that Kermit Larson's group-sampled? 10 MR. CHURCH: No, 11 DR. MALIK: I would sdrt of like to have a direct comparison in a few 12 places. i3 - MR. CHURCH: om. Early in the’ project we had Van Romney go back to a 14 number of those stations that theycalled “Persistent Stations" and had him 15 take a sort of a last sweep of samples.through those stations and he -- do 16 you remember the status of that reportt=It's not a published report, but I 17 guess I failed to recognize it yesterday. . Those stations did reach into Utah. 19 20 I think near Enterprise was the -- or, St. George, Veyo, Enterprise, Montamesa and a couple of other test stations. —— DR. ANSPAUGH: They were typically not . the same kind -- they wouldn't 21 meet the same criteria in terms of lawns and the same thing that we are 22 looking for here, though. 23 MR. CHURCH: They were basically desert areas. That's true, and I was going to addthose same kinds of 24 words. _ They sampled, I believe they sampled soil, natura} vegetation in 25 those particular 26 Enterprise area, you could get jack rabbits and stuff like that, 27 don't think they are directly comparable to the EML. type of effort. 28 DR. MALIK: areas and what wildlife was available;-such as I was wondering about migration of 75 in the but I clides from high