PRIVACY ACT MATERIAL REMOVEC This is again the dose via inhalation only, and this compares to a calculation of about 40 rads via ingestion. These results I have for all the litigants, if you're interested in They have not been handed out. them. The material gets to be very voluminous considering each individual radionuclide in each event for each individual.” The. next viewgraph (LRA-32) is the summary of these doses, which has been handed out for each litigant. Again this is our numbers for shot HARRY numbers for 7 : the that were on the previous 10 viewgraph; and you see it summed up here now for the total events of 2.9 11 rads to the thyroid and0.4%rads to the lower large intestine. The next viewgraph (LRA-33). 12 The next problem in terms of providing 13 doses for the litigants. was to- add up all these doses that we've been 14 talking from the 15 inhalation pathway, and also to deal with the doses from in utero exposure. 16 There were some problems in achieving that summation, because as it turned 17 out, 18 calculations provided us with geometric meansand doses at the 1%, 19 90%, 20 geometric standard deviation. 21 about the groups had the external pathway, ingestion provided different kinds of data. pathway, the The Los Alamos 10%, and 99% probability levels from which one- can, of course, extract a We, on the other hand, a have provided an arithmetic mean and have 22 estimated a geometric standard deviation. 23 assumed that the geometric standard deviation for the-dose from inhalation 24 was the same as it is for the dose from ingestion. 25 We have; I should mention, = So how do we deal with these different kinds of distributions, and so 26 forth? The next viewgraph (LRA-34) shows how we did this. We have summed 27 the arithmetic means, and where we had a geometric mean we can calculate an 28 arithmetic mean. We have assumed that the one thing you can do when you 43