Now after we have a preliminary site selection then the fifth criterion is that the field measurement confirms at a reasonable level that cesium is, indeed, present at that site. And finally, a sixth criterion that is very important is that the soil sample is collected successfully. Howard talked about several different kinds of problems. I think the worst problem is that there might be a serious problem of crosscontamination of samples; that the hole sloughs off, and you get relatively high activity material that falls down and contaminates the lower levels. So that if the soil sample is not collected successfully, that's reason for rejection of 10 that site. il The next viewgraph, please. (LRA-50). This shows our current results 12 in terms of numbers. We started out with 105 desired communities, target 13 communities, will, if you that we felt it was desirable to include. 14 Frosty's people went out, and according to my tabulations, selected 316 15 candidate sites attempting to look at more than one site within each 16 community, so that we had more than one choice if we encountered other 17 kinds of problems. Actually measured by field spectrometry were 276. On 18 the basis of those numbers, if we had three sites in a small community, and 19 they all had the same flux, then we only chose to, say, sample one of those 20 sites for soil; so that there was a considerable reduction in the total 21 number of sites that were actually selected for soil sampling. 22 In our present process now we've gone through, we had a target of 100 23 sites, and we actually selected 102 sites for lab cesium analysis. Four of 24 those are questionable in terms that they need further verification; so 25 that we may have 98-102 sites depenc.ng on how those verifications turn 26 out. That's mainly verification from somebody who will say that in their 27 memory that site has, in fact, been undisturbed since 1950. 28 The next viewgraph, please. (LRA-51). 194 Now this is a summary of these