oe
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, JANUARY 7, 1983, FRIDAY, 8:30 A.M.
CHAIRMAN MOSELEY:
Universal Time,
It's 30 minutes after the hour Coordinated
and we will
begin with a presentation by Dr. Ng on the
Progress on Internal Dose Assessment Models, and he will be followed by
Or. Anspaugh on another aspect of this subject.
Dr. Ng.
.
;
OR. NG:
Now,
10
ll
(Exhibit LRA-1)
May I have the second viewgraph now, please?
this viewgraph
(LRA-2)
simply emphasizes that the documents by
Hicks listed below have been published.
Next viewgraph
12
(LRA=3) please.
This viewgraph
shows how the dose
13
calculations are carried out,-and it summarizes the basic calculations for
14
the dose in somewhat different form than I've previously shown, but it is
15
essentially unchanged.
16
exposure
17
location.
18
1 mR/hr at H+12.
19
is
20
individual and varies with the nuclide and event.
21
which varies with the age group, nuclide and organ. The dose, therefore,
22
is specific for the individual, event, radionuclide, and organ.
23
the
_
The
rate
12
DEPNO
integrated
The DOS is” the product of four terms.
hours
is
the
postdetonation=.
deposition
It
varies
normalized
to
with
an
the
exposure
ER is the
shot
rate
It varies with nuclide, event and time of arrival.
intake
calculations
are
per
unit
carried
deposition.
out
as
shown
It's
specific
and
for
of
INDEP
the
DF is the dose factor
on the
next
viewgraph
24
(LRA-4).
The INPUT data consists of the birthdates of-the litigants; the
25
dates of the various test events; the intakes per unit deposition for the
26
individuals, nuclides, and events from Colorado State University; the resi-
27
dence locations and dates of residence at these locations, and the exposure
28
rates and times of arrival for the events and locations.
ll