Table 3.
(continued)
Cumulative
Community
Cumulative
population
exposure
exposure
.
Cumulative
- Cumulative
Community
exposure
population
exposure
Utah (continued)
——er
wee
Springdale
Sumit - —
Toquerville
°~.~-
2.7
0.52
560.
76.
Uvada
oo0.70
10.
Veyo
Vic's Place
2.3
510.
~~ = 2.8
—
280.
41.9
Vic's Service Station
Virgin
3.9
1.6
Zane
Q.30
Washington
Zion Lodge
3.3
7.8
240.
1,400.
1.2
7.5
--
5.6
nn’
—
—"
{Fallout was not distinguished from background radiation at these Arizona
communities: Catherine RangerStation, Davis Dam, Oatman, Peach Spring, Topock,
Truxton, Walapai, Warm Springs, WH} low Beach, and Yucca.
DF allout was not distinguished from background radiation at these California
communities: Amboy, Boron, Camp Irwin, Cantil, China Lake, Crest View, Daggett,
Hinkley, Inyokern, Littlelake, Ludlow, Manix, Mojave, Mountain Pass, Needles,
Newberry, Randsburg, Shoshone, South Haiwee, Tecopa, Trona, Wheaten Springs, and
ZZXYZ Springs.
7
“Fallout was not distinguished from background radiation at these Nevada
communities: Goodsprings, Johnnie, Nelson, Pop+s-Oasis, State Line, and Whitney.
aR eno was not included in the TMCEFD tabulationss— We calculated a population
estimated exposure of 1600 person-R from event. BOLTZMANN..
“Boyd, Cloud, Etna, Galt, Garnet, Hoya, Kyle, Leith,“Rox, Stine, and Vigo were
railroad maintenance stations. Apparently a crew of. 15 people moved from station
to station.
|
see
229