cross-contamination of the material.
There was an automatic "C" rating if
the sidewalls of the holes collapsed and fell into the hole, and if after
several
attempts
at
other
locations
to
collect
unsuccessful, then we would say that was a "C“ site.
samples
we
were
There is likely to be
transfer of material vertically that was not at the lower level when we
came to the site.
If we were unable to collect a full 30 cms, that also
gave an automatic “C" rating.
If
extraction
of
the
samples
required
use
of
any of
techniques, that also was considered very seriously.
the
special
A "B" rating came
10
from
ll
extracted manually.
12
contaminated the lower sample, or if most of the cores needed to be trimmed
13
indicating that an excess of materia} had come up the first extraction.
14
none of these things happened, then we rated it as an “A" site; so, our
15
criteria and our rating do not have the same quality, I might say, as those
16
done by DRI and by Livermore.
1?
those
That
places
where
some of
There was
the
holes
had
stones
that
concludes the collection process.
19
with soil processing.
20
been a good idea, but it seemed like a good idea at the time.
21
any questions?
23
DR. WARD:
If
You may be wondering what
those other two pages are.
_ CHAIRMAN MOSELEY:
to be
an automatic presumption that we cross-
18
22
had
Those are for my next presentation which deals
They are all attached together.
It may not have
Are there
Are thereany questions on this aspect?
What kind of an array do you have for the ten samples that
24
you take around the centerpoint?
25
is there but one?
26
DR. HAWTHORNE:
27
OR. WARD:
28
DR. HAWTHORNE:
I didn't see a plan view of the holes, or
Normally it was linear, straight line
I see, march along in one direction.
We tried to drive the stake where we thought the
118