—

|

€

-3 .

_

The measurement of body radiation by such analysis is very sensitive and re-

quires complex electronic equipment and personnel highly trained in electronics ©
from Brookhaven ‘National Laboratory.
3.

Personnel exposure to gamma radiation: Gamma levels on the island

were derived from data furnished by other radiological survey groups.
MONITORING DATA
The results of the personnel monitoring data on people living at Bikini
since 1969 are presented in the accompanying tables.
analyses are presented on Table I.

The data on urine

Note that average pci/liter for Bikini

urine compared with Rongelap was for

90 Sr

2.5/3.8 and for

13705 638/3360.

Based on standard guide lines (International Congress of Radiation Protection ~
ICRP) these isotopes have been well below maximum permissible levels.

assuring also is the virtual absence of plutonium in the samples.

Re-

Levels |

for internally absorbed 1376. as measured by spectrographic analyses are
presented in Table 2.

Note the average values for males and females on

Bikini compared with those on Rongelap (in nCi/pg body weight) was 1.4/6.4,
again well below the maximum permissible levels.

The graphs in figures 1

cond 2 show that body burden (extrapolated) for 90 ~“Sr and 1370, in the Bikini

people are well belowthe peak values noted in the Rongelap people.

The

Rongelap people reached a peak of 6-11% of the maximum 90, permissible
level (for general populations) and of about 22% for 13706,

These low

values for internally absorbed radionuclides is in accord with the fact

that the people on Bikini have been subsisting mainly on imported foods.
The contribution of gamma radiation to the people on Bikini is somewhat
greater than on Rongelap.

Select target paragraph3