0018933

TABLE 3.6
COMPARISON OF AIRBORNE AND DEPOSITED FRACTIONS
gr99
Fraction Fraction
Deposited Airborne

cs37
Total

Fraction Fraction
Deposited Airborne

Total

Koa

0,65

0.20

0.85

0.47

0, 64

1.11

Walnut

0.71

0.41

1.11

0. 88

0.78

1, 66

Oak

0.49

0,45

0.94

0.37

‘0, 61

0.98

4 hours for the land shot, and 6 hours for the reef shot, is quite uniform
in composition and exhibits little evidence of fall rate-dependent fractionation,

sr 7° is generally more depleted in the reef shot than the land

shot, while the reverse is true for cs!37,

The 4-hour fallout from the water surface shot is depleted in both
nuclides, but the 10-and 13-hour samples show an enrichment.

latter samples have nearly the same composition.

The two

The failure of the 6-and

8-hour flight missions makes the data rather scanty in this case,
These effects are brought out clearly by the numbers listed in Table

3.7.

|
3.1.3 Combined Cloud and Fallout Data.

SAN BRENO EG
Another way of estimating

the fraction of Mo?? left in the cloud, independent of the fission ratios, is
based on a material balance for some nuclide, Y.

R-values for nuclide Y

Select target paragraph3