oe _. ae ee moceinn aoe wee amg ‘oT NW ——e eee ee | = — — — a a —_ —— OBSERVATIONS ——— ee ee ee Ll | ——— . eee eee eee ee a ———_ —— SE eee | asm cues ond a a =_eD a Del a — A | | a eee a oe oe _—ia eee ee _— _ “T | Zs ——— EE wee ESTIMATES OF THYROID CANCER INCIDENCE RISK PER UNIT DOSE og my fst 3 iy re orn a, Figure 1. Schematic of approach. ———- — he oe eee eee ee OUTPUT FROM THIS STUDY af EP oat Le Le Me at | —— —_— ow ow + “yt toy EXPOSED INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL THYROID DOSE ESTIMATES ee THYROIO NOOULE AND CANCER STATISTICS re AGE ANO V4. INTAKE ESTIMATES FOR RADIOIOOINES AND RACIOTELLUAIUMS FOR FOOD, &R, SKIN AND WATER PATHS PLUS ESTIMATES OF CUMULATED EXTERNAL EXPOSURE i ‘Sg THYROID DOSE l UTIRIK ANDO SIFO ISLANDS PLUS EXPOSURE RATE HISTORIES ee tare T RATE RESULTS COMPOSITION OF FALLOUT AT RONGELAP - [um tem RONGELAP BIKIN] ASH — ee ee _ i faMngt| 11,08 OBSERVATIONS | -- [Oars FALLOUT ADULT URINE i- | — a =e ——— — ooo