.,
i
resuspension, i.e.; batch plant operation.
..
I
Occupational hazards aboun(i
.
.—
.,
\
.- .
and”~ave-~een meitioned’in the ‘appropriateannex.
I
CONCLUSIONS
.. .
-------.,___
..—
---.
-----.-. . .-” ------....-.;.
...
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ...
.. ..
-. .-..
.. .
The RSAIT arrived at three conclusions of note. First, resuspension
1
~
of plutonium has not been a problem and does net now appear to be a
..
.
operation. Second, the bulk haul of
problem even at the 5a.tchphnt
.:
“.
.
contaminated soil is efficient and safe, and does not require any
.,.-.. :.:
,.
-?
degree of radiation protection.
extraordina.z.z
,“
,.
Third? occupational
problem during this cleanup operation.
hazards still tie tie predominant
,..,
... ~
.,.
. ..
.
.
.,.’
“,.
..
... :.
....,
1.
There is no need for personnel to wear surgical face masks at
Enjebi.
. --
2.
.
..
P.esgiratoryprotectio~ against plutonium is only logical at the
time’earth is physically %ing
transit.
3.
moved about’,but not during water
,..
Cont3nued command emphasis on occupational safety and health is
essential for the completion of this operational program.
.,,..,:.,
..~
-,
....
. ....
... ..,.
-..
,
.
2