.

hoo

So RE She
+: als

+

*

oe

: . a

.

:

‘

_" 3 ‘ oea 7ojme

ae

:

7

i

:

.

.

.

.

a
:

27

Tb
a MA
Met
‘hem

.

n eo.
atirrgh
.

“

*

.

“-

8

Bee
wots
As

.

a . ws

AORBOE :

“aeCOPYAVAILABLE os

Geewo

yee,

¥ of : fs
wy

i
ye 4
pe
.

Ph oe

ed

cee eee We ts

vu. 24, WO. Ld

FYn

~ Commentary: INTEGRITY OF HEAL
by Jeffrey Jefferson
marshall islands atomic litigation project
The August release of the
"Guinea Pig" report, which
documents the long history of

?
'
f

Islands detonation. in
a
detailed discussion the report
documents instances where

Atomic Energy Commission as

the AEC cut off funding for
scientific research projects

risks associated with low-level

the

a more critical time for the
people of the Marshall islands.
To an unparalleled degree, it
i the people of the Marshall

scientists
tw
falsify field
reports, transferred scientists

false information disseminated
by
the -AEC to their
irreparable detriment. This

security’ any scientific results

lies

and

to

health

coverups
and

by

the

enviromental

radiation, could mot come at

islands who relied upon the

reliance, combined with the
axtensiveness of the weapons
testing program conducted
within the Marshal] islands
have created the most vivid
example to date of not only

the

dangers

radiation,

fundamental

af low-levd

but also

raise

— ~ questions

conceming the vory integrity
of the AEC, and the standard

of conduct by the United
States as trustee under the

United Nations Agreement.
To begin, it is important to
recognize that the report has
as os) focus the nuclear
weapons testing conducted at

the

Nevada

test

site.

However, the conclusions are
drectly applicable to - the

situation in the Marshall
Islands in that the report

establishes,
goverment

through
records,
the

AEC's level af understanding

as to health and enviromental!
risks aS a time prior to the

which raised questions as to
health risks

nuciear

testing,

involved

in

instructed

who woidd not participate in

the coverups, and classified
under the pretext of ‘national

that did not support the
AEC's thesis that nuclear
testing was ‘safe’.
it i here that the report
reaches its most important
conclusion, a conclusion which
relates directly to questions

now facing the people of the
Marshall

Islands. The report

concludes that a conflict of
interest exits between the
AEC's role as the promoter

of nuclear technology, and its

role as the funding authority
for radiation health research.
The report finds the conflict
continues to this day, and

further motes that the AEC's

successor
agencies——
the
Department of Energy, the
Department of Defense, and
the
Nuclear
Regulatory
Commission, are also subject

to ‘this conflict.

,

In light of these disclosures

serious questions must be ask

concerning the implementation

"of the Marshall Islands health
mandated
care
plan
LAW
PUBLIC

24 Ae
WM oe.
fhe he
PERaaM wee
cata
aw.

by

;AEC's

successor

agencies

mist be viewed with not only

a great deal of suspicion but

also with a degree cf alarm.

For only time will show if the

medical monitoring program
established pursuant to the
new Federal Act will be one
designed to meet the bealth
needs of the Marshallese

people, or if it will be one,
the mtent of which, will be
continue to down play
health risks associated with
nuclear exposure.

Recognizing the people from

the

have

various

affected

differing

atnils

solutions

to

many of the nuclear related
issues before them today, and

further

that

the

Marshail

islands Government is now
also involved in these issues
as the representative of an
emerging independent nation,
nevertheless all would seem to °
share a common goal insofar
as
any health monitoring
program is concerned. That
goal must be to ins@e the

integrity of any health care

program so established. Given
the AEC's past record it is
inconceivable
that
this
agency's successors
would
eve
=obe
considered
for
Participation in this task.
While some issues remain -the

subject of dispute among the
involed parties, such as the

scope of the health care
program as evidenced by the
positions taken at the recent

po-20% Washington

DC meeting on

fog

.

6

-

Me

:

iaeste S Yisan
,,
pttPeet
tee

“oe
-

Pe
eae
ey * fla aie
tae Ah:

ro

Select target paragraph3