area

_—

wow am

HEADQUARTERS

TASK GROUP 7.1

AGO at

JOINT TASK FORCE SEVEN

£6

Los

a

ALAMOS

SCIENTIFIC

LABORATORY

J Division. P.O.Box 1663

|

Los

Alamos.

New Mexico

29 July 1954

Gordon M. Dunning

Biophysics Branch

Division of Biology and Medicine
U. S. Atomic mergy Commission
s

a

.

*

Tal.

Washington 25, D.C.

Dear Gordon:

A

*

s

CONFIRMED TO BE UNCLASSIFIED

aY AUTHORITY OF DOELOC
c
Hf
1 ff- (- 34
a

sate

by: Dick KooChLe 9-19-87

Thank you for your complimentary letter. The maintenance of records at
an operation leaves much to be desired and it entails the largest work
load of the unit. We have been studying methods to improve present
dosimetry practices and hope that by experience we can improve and simplify
the system presently used at the Nevada and Pacific Proving Grounds.
Two conspicuous deficiencies were noted during the operation:
a.

ina widely dispersed operation, control mst be exerted through

the use of self-reading pocket dosimeters -- but these dosimeters should
reflect film badge dosage, should be operative in areas of high moisture

and under rugged usage, and should be easily maintained and repaired. At
Castle we were hindered by cheap and unreliable pocket dosimeters as well
as high loss rates.

b.

High contamination conditions, dispersal of activities aboard

scattered ships, and the processing and recording of film badges under
fluid ccnditions is too slow for adequate control of personnel exposures
when there is lack of a coordinated, planned program of activities within
a radiologically contaminated area, A number of exposures between 4 and
5 reentgens were the result of late film recordings "catching up" with a
worker who had ccntinued to work in a contaminated area without respite.
We felt that a limit of 3.0 roentgens would have provided a buffer that
would have materially reduced the number of overexposures.
An analysis of exposures reveals 23 exposures in excess of 12 roentgens.
The 3 exposures of Task Group 7.1 were military personnel of a DOD project
who were assessed readings on the basis of one film badge left in a tent
on Rongerik Atoll during a period of radioactive fall-out. Actual exposure
is believed to be 40 - 45 roentgens,.

Three TG 7.3 boat operators returned film badges reading 85, 95 and 96

roentgens. Our investigation indicated their activities did not substantiate
these high exposures and left their actual exposure subject to question,

Ty

DOSARCHIVES

Select target paragraph3