tremsfer of the en-site red-safe function from the Test Direstor tc the Support Direster. eret Feressechlc argusents (1) fest Direster loses direct ecatrels (2) Support Director end his ergmisetion are not qualified to de the Jed; onc (3) That it is impossible fer the eupleyer (LASL, UCnL, Semdie Corporation, ete.) to trmsafer responsibility fer safety of his pereennel te the Suppert Director. These possible arguments heve been carafully eonsidered ond aes fees CUPL AVAILABLE (1) The Test Direster will retain the seme sort of eentrel for "personnel" neniters as in Teapot. mest eritics! iteu ef sonesrn. This is tle This eontrel will be through the party lester md the matiter-atvisor, whe, in most eaves, would be « menber ef the Test Direeter's ergenisation, With reference to the supporting fumetions ef whieh the Test Director would be relieved, he would be in the seu reletive position os fer other @uprorting serviess whieh ere essentis) to the susesssful empcution of the experimental prejeets amd prebedly would we in mo worse position then previously when he hei Gelegetec operating responsibilities to a silitery efficer oid utilised » DOD grow on a mission bepis. 48 in the past, rad-safe operctions would be eontrelied hy « Geteiled eperastions ple, scordinsted and agreed to ly