es ouch ond should net depend ea eperaticnel awrpert. bs t tik Ay AGLABLE The eoneept ef rad-sefe philesephy ef DOD amd aFC is besleslly different. From the publis relations end legsl espeete, s*C must plem and eperate te esceuplish ite ebjective within the secepted limits of astivity end exposure fer civilians ed the genersl public. Exceptions eon be telersted enly in nest unusual situs tioms end then only after eoreful sfvenee eensiderestion end approve) by the aC. The OOD attitede ond sonespt is not aearly os striet, om? eduestion ef BOD personnel te the aC eonsept is diffieult and inecupetible with their ow. concept. The sentinued une ef BOD pervennel in the envsite ref-sale eperetion meas at least three @ifferent organisations involved in my test eetivity: (1) the wer, (2) the Support Centrester, end (3) the BOD. it is diffiewlt, if act impeenible, te integrate military end eontreeters! perscanel, md it hes been the expressed pelley ef PTD that this was not te be @ovw. The NFTL has been hepiy to provide ea servies an e mission brsis but not individuals te integrate inte on AFC orgenisation. DOE ARCHIVES Any @ontinuing estivity by DOD et RIS would undoubtedly recuire eytensive efditions] DOP suprert fwmetions aA ej2Ze