Chromosome-type aberrations were found in 23 of the 43 exposed people
and 5 of the 8 unexposed individuals (Table II). Proportionally, the largest
number of persons with chromosome aberrations was found in the low exposure
group with 84 per cent. The unexposed group was next with 62 per cent and
this was followed by the high exposure group in which only 40 per cent of
the people showed aberrations. In each of the two exposure groups one half
of the aberrations consisted of two-hit events such as dicentric chromosomes,
exchanges and a ring,

the remainder being acentric fragments.

The incidence

of acentric fragments was unusually high in the unexposed group, but in

contrast to the exposed people no two-hit aberrations were found among them.

The difference between the exposed and unexposed groups with regard to the
incidence of two-hit aberrations was found to be significant at the 1 per
cent level (p<0.001).

Aberrations ranged from one to four per person. Sixteen of the 23
exposed people (70%) with chromosome aberrations had more than one such
aberration; two of the 5 unexposed (40%) had multiple aberrations. In most
instances no more than one aberration was noted per cell.

m4

There was no correlation between the occurrence of thyroid pathology
and chromosome aberrations. Ten of the exposed people included in this
group developed thyroid pathology since these examinations were made. Only

four of them had shown chromosome aberrations earlier; three were children
and one an adult at the time of exposure.

No aberrations were found in the karyotypes that had been made from
the 32 grossly intact cells from the four subjects showing relatively high
aberration rates. Likewise, no abnormalities were seen in 50 cells from
the bone marrow of one of the exposed subjects.
Discussion

The results of this study demonstrate that a small but significant
number of chromosome aberrations has persisted in blood lymphocytes of
some of the Marshallese people for ten years following exposure to whole-body gamma radiation from fallout. This conclusion rests on the finding
of the large number of two-hit aberrations (dicentrics, exchanges and a
ring chromosome) in the exposed people which constituted one half of all
chromosome aberrations seen. This was in striking contrast to the findings
in the unexposed people in whom no two-hit aberrations were found even
though the overall number of chromosome aberrations in this group was about
the same and even a fraction higher than that in the exposed people taken
as one group. Since two-hit aberrations were seen only in the people who
had whole-body gamma ray exposure and not in the unexposed group, we
interpret this finding as a residual effect of radiation.
We are unable to explain the greater incidence of chromosome
aberrations in the group exposed to 70 rads as compared to the group that
received 175 rads. We are also unable to account for the unusually high
incidence of acentric fragments in the unexposed and their relative
defecit in the exposed people. One might consider causative factors such
as the low levels of internal radiation exposure from absorption of radionuclides such as 137¢5, 657n,
Os, or exposure to such things as virus

139

Select target paragraph3