-14- Beach sand BEACH Intert idal “ peach sand at Belle was sampled only . aLice SAND JANET oLive . vera twice, at the first and the last of the experimental period (Fig. 4). . . These sparse data suggest & considerably low- .~ z er initial level than for island soil, and a somewhat lower decline rate of -0.7. ; Figure 8 shows beach sand declines : _ because of the con- __, the sand. The northern islands were only slightly more _ Leroy e . ° there was great oa variability, possibly of . wenny "| As with island soil shifting eLwer onuce for eight islands, and pre-Nectar levels except at Elmer. tinual . ad © cave ‘oFren wav is, 1994 Pig. 8 radioactive than the southern islands, but the declines at the southern islands, especially Henry and Leroy, tended to be steeper than at the northern islands. The slower decline at northern than at southern islands is probably caused by a greater residue of radioactivity from previous detonations (higher pre-Nectar levels) at northern localities, possibly associated with the water currents. The decays for beach sand are given in Table 4, page 13. Except for Henry (Pig. 5), these are based upon only two points. Beach sand decays were sappreciably steeper at the southern than at the northern islands. The relationship be- tween the slopes of declines and decays was inconsistent. At Henry decline slightly exceeded decay. At Leroy decays were steeper than declines, and at other localities differences were negligible. In general, decays were steeper than declines, although not convincingly so.

Select target paragraph3