Comptroller Division remained substantially unchanged.

With the

exception of certain minor revisions in the AEC~DOD agreement, the
criteria governing fiscal support of overseas tests were retained

substantially as used during IVY.

There occurred, however, changes .

in the mechanics of allocating certain Task Force funds which should
be pointed out.

In previous operations, the Task Force Headquarters

had administered Research and Development (R&D) funds along with the
extra-military funds needed to meet Task Force funding requirements.
Inasmuch as DOD scientific participation in CASTLE was to be more

extensive than in IVY, the entire matter of the AFSWP position in
the JTF SEVEN organization came under consideration early in 1953.
AFSWP traditionally has been the responsible agency for the preliminary budgeting for joint task forces.

After much discussion, it

was agreed that R&D funds would be allotted to using agencies by

AFSWP rather than by the Task Force Headquarters.

AFSWP, during

the discussions, also proposed to administer the extra-military

funds to be utilized by the Task Force, receiving such funds from
the Department of the Army and then allotting to the Task Force.
This plan proved incompatible with command relationships and with

the respective missions of the parties concemed, however; and the
extra-military funds originally scheduled for JTF SEVEN were withdrawn from AFSWP to be subsequently allocated to the Task Force by

the Department of the Army in accordance with a concept arrived at
in the DOD Comptroller's office after JTF SEVEN became a permanent
organization,

36

.

Select target paragraph3