NOTE 16 CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS Henry I. Kohn, 16 Nov 89 } CHouse Subcommittee on Insular & International Longuorth House Office Building, 16 Nov 89.) Affairs, room 1324, I am Henry I. Kohn, appointed by RepMar to review the DOE-1982 on the habitability of Rongelap Island. This was done in Report accordance with section 103Ci2. considered other the Compact of Free Association Act, pertinent information available at them {Preliminary Report, April Report, March Public Law 99-239, In addition to DOE-1982, my Reassessment ° 89]. 388; , the Report, July °88; Reparts time of Corrected writing I have now been asked to comment on the Proposal by the Rongelap people - that they be given $6.6 million to set up an expert committee which in the course of 1.5 years would make a comprehensive health and radiologic investigation of themselves and their Atoli. The results would be used by a succeeding expert committee to evolve and execute a plan to make Rongelap Atoll CProposed Let us consider some of the reasons given in the Proposal. Workplan For A Phase 2 Comprehensive Study, P & D Technalogies, that 1989). ‘ Ci] The QOE-1982 Report Rangelap Island is "safe". £2] A complete detailed made for every Rpongelap citizen and urinary plutonium analysis). given to infants and small [33 The radiation individually. citizen dose C4) Additional soil for proper dosimetry. should be C5] The Bramlitt field-tested. delaying health should its dosimetric evaluation should have been data soil-decontamination socio-economic conclusian have been estimated for each from ali process factors for islands 15 plutonium should have My general conclusion is that such a vast plan is unnecessary, it could not be accomplished in 1.5 years: it would result in the return First. to Rongelap Island. - The Congress specified that the habitability of- Rongelap Island - not Atol? - was to be 1ssue, therefore, is to estimate dosage for now and for the future. 900016 in (e.g. including chromosome analysis Special attention should have been contamination C6) Radiation-sensitive defined and evaluated. and that was wrong children. needed been "safe" for habitation. examined. The immediate crucial from residence on that island Second. The Reassessment Project found that the dase due 9 residence an Rongelap Istand was within the permissible range [less than 5 rem in 30 years] whether based an the data suppi:ed dv the Brookhaven or the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The tus -4a-