4.5 Dose Summary The dosage problem as developed in this Report breaks down into three parts: the adult dose, the uncertainty introduced into the adult dose by the transuranics; the infant dose. {a} Adult dose. For the 30-year period 1990-2020, the one of current interest, the following tabulation shows that all three estimates of the adult dose [based on the community type B diet] meet the 5 ren guide. Rongelap: 30-year Adult Exposure (1990-2020) Source Livermore data Brookhaven data**** DOE-1982 Report*** * =x wee Whole-body (ren) Red marrow {ren) 1.80% 1.88%* 91* (.88 - (3.8]}) 98% (.93 ~ [5.3]) 1.9 2.9 Committed effective dose equivalent Committed dose equivalent Tntegral doses xexe The median transuranic dose was employed. The Brookhaven doses are about half the others; cesium-137 was measured with the whole-body counter, the preferred method for its determination. [The “total dose" is based on the median plutonium dose, the "range" on the lowest and highest individual doses.] DOE-1982 stated that the diet on which its reported doses were based consisted only of local foods from Rongelap Island [but see footnote, p. 23). That statement is incorrect. Lawrence Livermore calculated the cited dose on the basis of the community type B diet, and that diet (for comparability) has been used for the calculation of all doses above. The cancer mortality risk for 500 persons settled on Rongelap Island and receiving 1.9 rem over the next 30 years. would be: §00 x 1.9 x 2.5 x 10-4 = .24 cases The risk factor used here is 2.5 times that advocated in the National Academy of Science (1972) report. It is lower than what is being used for the Japanese survivors (Shimuzu et al 1987; Preston & Pierce 1987), but they experienced high-dose and high-dose~-rate exposure whereas the Rongelap exposure would be low and at an extremely low dose-rate. 5000b4 1 ‘4 40 . p vs