“x . eonsulted by the governmenicl plannexs and mexts these require_ments exceptionally well. Short of involving so many advisors and planners that Cecesions and action are unduly imscded, it is essential that 1? tg those representing all the relevant disci lines work together as a group with the Enewetak Flanning Council ana the governmental decision-makers. To some extent this is what has ‘been done during planning to date, but for the remainder of the program, the relevant disciplines should be identified as such, appropriate representatives engaged and organized into a more or less formal advisory council. 3. _ Radiolocical Considerations 3.1. The Radiolocical Survey The survey of radiological condit ions at Enewetak Attoll in 1972 under the auspices of the Atomic Energy Commission is, we believe exceptionally good as far as it goes, but we have been advised by capable experts in the field that more work remains to be done and that the qualifications of the four-member Task Group a which Supervised the conduct of the survey, the assessmentofits Guta and developed final recormendations are open to question. It is also apparent that as-detailed and elaborate as that survey was, follow-up gathering of data and careful assessment of that data is ——_—— absolutely essential, particularly with respect to the risk to health from all low-level, long-life radionuclides and especially the dancer posed by those alpha-emitting radionuclides known as hotparticles, such as Plutonium-239 and Americium-241, We do not wish to detract from the qualifications of the . -6- q) DNTRD co meee naes vs crt a a ‘af . WR | “54 a Tt ts 1 oo At nm. ia ty x &5 aN $e ae: we whe wt