oe e ee fi we cleanup phases of the program. (DEIS, Vol. I, pp. 5-73, 6-5) Even * mt ale ndar 3S Cu oer tT * ow J if the Task Group is enlarged as we have suggested and specific A developed an@ implemented, this monitoring ore arc et will perform a crucial function. we ee ety Satcet fF. = aa we vty aly a am hn - Thus, it is important that its muomoersnip be carefully selected. It is imper ative that radio- scientists of the most conservative cast be inciuded in the — monitoring group. Here again, we suggest that the names of Drs. Me Martell, Geesdman, Tamplin and Cochran. tal Corn As ate aa The ie 8 _And the on-site authority of the nonitoLing group Should be clearly defined, with all important or unexpected problems to be referred to the enlarged Task Group. / ene 3.6. Test Plantings, Groundwater and Air Sampling We are in full agreement with the AEC Task Tw. Ay be feke Group recommenda- je e? tions for test plantings, lens water and air sampling. pp. 5-80 to 5-81.) (vol. - yo But it is not clear whether these recommendaa- tions have been implemented. They must be and the studies should be commissioned to the best scientists and technicians available, under the over-all guidance of the enlarged Task Group. 2 All of ean oe c™ ‘oe these studies must deal explicitly with the hot particle problem. 3.7. Radiobiological Health Followup AEC Task Group recommendation 12 (Vol. I, p. 5-81) calls for "Baseline surveys of body burdens and urine content of Cs-137 and Sr-90... for the Enewetak people prior to return to Enewetak Atoll, and periodically thereafter." But here, too, it is not clear whether a firm commitment to long-range radiological health monitoring of the Enewetak population has becn made, and, if so, ‘ese Dagee eae Dh ight aed Fae Rig s.. Ms. ot 7 : . os pein 2 — vibts ik ee ey i= ao reptts 2 4 aiXp faga 4s hes eRe ‘, uated Ae oy