(%
.
:
(rea
the objective is to achieve a substantial
_,
reduction jn plutonium soil concentraticns,
and further,
j pani
to reduce concentrations to
het
the lowest practicable level, not to reduce
them to sors cyveceribed numericil value.
ron gen
(Gabid. Enenasis aadccd.)
oan
.
‘
.
de. a
my
Lae ee
ry
()
ute
a
Nor is
t
case" decisions.
+
al
~dn-
elcarx
wae me TY
Whew
ede ae
ree tet.
be
CEN
,
“3
boas
PMese
te
-
case
—!
fre s
s
ayn
Presumably it is the "team of experts" referred
to in the recommendations of the Task Group
(Vol. II,
Tab B,
p.
27),
but Wearenottold.who theyare_orhow theywil]heselected.
This whole approach must be explained and justified, especially at a time wnen the EPA is conducting hearings around the
ae
=
country on plutonium soil standards for precisely the purpose of
developing “numerical values" for the maximum concentrations
permissible.
The range between 4G and 400 pCi/g is a wide cne
an ceed anc if 40 is too high,
.
~~
-
*
.
*
ot
then to make decisions on a nease-Fee
me
a
i
by-case" basis within that range is to have no standard at all. y
ee
eR
nr re r nee
Before any. final standards are set for the radiological
ee
Pie
uy
JoTaxe vf
.
cleanup of Enewetak, the International Commission on Radiological /° **
—
aR
Protection should be called upon for plutonium and actinide
Standards applicable to air, water,
soils and food concentrations
for both soluble and insoluble activities,
exposure to the general public.
applicable to long-range
Application should also he made
to the U.S. Envircnmental Protection Agency for special hearings
for the same purpose.
Consideration should also be given to the
desirability of requesting the United
Nations Scientific Committee
aeeneeennpanamiinn
on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to conduct hearings and set
these standards.
(We are indebted to Dr.
eeae
Suggestions.) |
Martell
for these
—nen,
.
,
——
Ki ae bie
pef
MH
oe
ula.
pte A
Sy eeee
MOR
ge “ee
"a el
hag
et,
.
Seo
‘
* ate
AYE 8S ae
me
i
sah og
”