Bicisistering
fn
s.ctatricties,
cn
however,
are not
sev out
2overed by the terms of the
treet
"
tne Tnitei Vitiions:
in detail
individual
Goodrich, Hambro & Simons, Charter of
Commentary & Documents 502 (3d ed.
1969).
cholars agree that these obligations
as well as the trust relationship
tn character and constitute restrictions
she administering authorities.
Thus:
='
and 'tutelle' (in the French text of
verms of generally accepted legal
ring a delegation and fundamental
z
fanivicons
nority - a limitation inconsistent
advantage or an unrestricted
in the authority entrusted
of administration.
2 1.
Trrenneim, Ireasise On International Law § 94n, at
Zil
‘ich #2. =. Laeutersacht 1955).
ts
siministerei
7225
isn
in the
Trust tiesnir
Le: f-
in zrcordance with the beneficial purposes
cnerter of the United Nations and the
izreemenis."
{Ftn 23.
Trust territories must
1247)
individual
G. Sehwarzenberger, A Manual of International
See also H. Lauterpacht, Internation21 Ley
2 Daren Eignis 130-f1 (1950); C. de Visscher, Theory & Reality Is
Pacli:z Inverretiona? lay 213 (rev.ed. P. Corbett transl. 1962);
Portadriin,
Hamtrc % Simons, Charter of the United Nations:
k Ditamenis -7i,
722-53 (3d ed.
le 2
21,
E-,
illus.
Commentary
1969); Rest. 2d, Foreign Relations
a: 71 (1965).
The Trustsssniz Agreement provides in Article 6 that
tne
giminiscvering auvhnority
wrimtte
The
z2intmi2
inngcitants
=
alilé
z
irertce
enn ti
T2.4
eyricie
PRB. L
f,
vnis
tis “SEs
7
2
end shall regulate the use
of
Pisneries,
of natural resources;
agricultures,
and
industries;
iP transpertation and cormunic|arion;
rrctest
iggins t whe .oss of their lands and resources
Tt
Tromcte
2992124
shall.
givancement and self-sufficziency of the
Leveltrment
Tle Lanecitancvi
[the United States?
Z2L82 mandates
tne social
that
the administrative
advancement
end
"
2utncority
rrctect
tne