+ el MoT aT? “TOP SeCKET THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON 23, D. C. eT ree ’ a wo 21 March 1958 * MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, AD HOC PANEL ON NUCLEAR 2 TEST CESSATION.ten a Testing - eae oe iat SUBJECT: ; The Effects of a Total Suspension or Cessation of Nucleas Pursuant to NSC Action No. 1840, 6 January 1958, representa- | Sur beeee SaPrP oe oy + tives of the Department of Defense have participated in the discussions of your Panel concerning the technical feasibility of monitoring a nuclear weapons tests suspension and the predicted technological status of the United States and the USSR with respect to the development of nuclear . weapons, assuming a total suspension of nuclear tests as of 1 September ay 1958, , Documents prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission and the Central Intelligence Agency portraying the predicted position of the United States and the USSR, respectively, have been considered by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and their views relative to the military impact of cesaation of testing are transmitted herewith. The reports of the Atomic Energy Commission and the Central ae<a a nay mates of the technological positiona of ti United States and the USSR, with the understanding that events of the near future may necessitate significant revisiong of these estimates.’ Broadly stated, the estimates indicate that at present and also aa of the end of 1958, the United States applications, in the economy of wee of special nuclear materials and possibly in knowledge of weapons effects of a specialized nature. lt is reagonable. to assume that with the continuation of testing the gap will be narrowed and that both nations may be expected to attain the practicable limite of nuclear weapon development as these limits can be foreseen at this time. It is equally reasonable to assume that in the absenceof testing the gap will likewise be narrowed but at a slower rate which will be governed by a number of factors over which the _. : This document consists of i” 15 pgs, Cy F% of 35, } Series | a A Ht xt possesses an advantage in yield vergus, weight ratios, in flexibility of DECLASSIFIED l BSee ETSS tel f= ee _—_— Intelligence Agency are accepted as reasonable and satisfactory esti- ‘ Q & 6 3 < “Sechef Conte nolS-VSESIE | ae RESTRICTED DATiFFORTEENEROACF6F194 F199 Seb - (252-4 fe re

Select target paragraph3