J3ctle29
“FEIT:
16 Jamary 1957
Im not sure. ‘That again stens fron which one of these three situations
vwo're talking thaate
Wir
Wel, will the monoy be avalleble for this ship?
GIsBIHS: Yes, because I think that's a lot loss money, Sut it’s orly less if you
don't have majer installations eshore.
|
SANDERS: It sects to mw, Walt, 1£ you can prove that you can eharten the operation
by a third, you can justify the expenditare.
RIG:
.
We had an awful lot ef questions on CASTIZ, from the visiting dignitaries,
as to what the operation cost per dsy.
The only ficure I romexber, amd
I was surprised thet it vas as low as it was, was one for the Iipay roll
during the interim period, somthing like 355,000 a day.
.
SANDERS: I think ona good point, as I understend it, that the possibility of cone
taninating the felmds fron Taonci is very slicht, and you might save &
Lot of exponiiture there. I think soredsy if ve keop using Bilin’, ‘yolre
going to have to wash that place off or smcthing.
|
GI3BINS: Yell, we have to look at all threu of those cituatiens, because it's
going to be quite a long tims befera we lmow just which one of these
throe we're going te have te operate under,
FELT:
let mo say ore nce thing here,
|
I think we've been gotting slightly off
the track hore, Wetve bean talking about justifications md I really don't
thirk that that's quite our business, I tink what we want to do is esa
tablish what various needs ara mder these various conditions mi that
wa ere going to have te get sone help.
What we really want aro facts
er test expert opinions, or something of that sort, rather than arguments,
In the arguments, we ean help but I would imagine that this would be left
up to York and Bradbury to argue with ‘Jlertfard, Sterbind, etc,
[aiEO/cgg
RO.
hat
we want to do here, I think, is to sea thy. we would reed to include
a
=>