t

?

s
es u“ee.

he,

uy

yoo

.

1

qo

beg
hyeUa,
7% . oh 85 S,
ty

It is estimated that this

tt

"was reduced ‘to 43 mr/hr at 7.5 days-after shot.

agi
has
4 xWE hie
ue ,7e

“.° value will allow a 30 day trip without exceeding 3.9 r dosage for the crew.
The devarture of certain Task Force ships delayed the decontami-

nation of YAG 40 because the trained decontamination personnel left with

~

sya

my 3 aay

- them.

AS soon as other personnel are obtained and trained, decontamination

This decontamination will consist, in part, of the removal

of special protective coatings from all topside surfaces,

It is estimated

oe

Praha aye
n
z

will proceed,

“ety ot Si ¥

,)
te

i

_ that this operation will require 525 man-hours.
Aircraft Studies

*

The aircraft were off-loaded after they had been on the YAGs less

ay
ya,

“> than a week,

+

On the Able (YAG 39) aircraft the left magneto drop-off was

Vad,

va ade

‘" above tolerance but not excessive.

was evident.

Since the Baker (YAG 0) aireraft did not check out before the

Shot no inspection was made afterward,

e

:

No other damage except minor corrosion

On the Able aircraft,decontamination was accomplished by use of

hot liquid jet with detergent, scrubbing with detergent, and scrubbing with
. Gunk, all in sequence.

This treatment reduced the cockpit reading from

220 me/hr to 52 mr/hr.
i

Fig. 6.4-5 shows the decontamination methods and results on the
Baker aircraft.
Taking into account the difference in contamination levels on the

patna er

two ships (see Washdown) it is estimated that the washdow was 95% effective

1 RET

§

at 7 hours after shot.
The contaminant was not visible on either aircraft.

Beta radiation

levels on top surfaces were 2 to 5 times those on underside surfaces.

cOPlIED/DOE

LANL RG ~

annnpe

-46-

Vertical

Select target paragraph3