e
> 38
‘eal:
project 6h = ==90F TESTING ON AW SHIP COUNTERMEASURES
Projesst C-“Ticer - G. G. Molumphy, CAPT, USN
. =
General
.
-
As i= the —srevious test, YAG 39 was manned by a special primary
=
"board USS Baic~oko.
Operations for this shot were completely successful.
_$pacing between the
-vessels varied somewhat more than during the previous
ea
“test, but was zeners—ly within 3,000 yards.
Ships! courses are shown in
Pig.
lt 6s4-1. S2ak come rates on YAG hO were within the desired range. After
teh
.
. | "Tecovery, the ships
were returned to Parry where survey, and recovery of
, _atreraft, games, aozd recorded data were accomplished.
ae et
Qamma Instrume--tation
Con=inuoc= gamma radiation measurements were recorded far the
“@aze stations as ix mrevious tests.
were in operacion.
ele performace.
All 137 stations with 427 detectors
Of these, approximately 50 detectors were of question~
<There were no detector failures noted during the first
4
16 OF “Ope:
“yt
5
Washdowrz
ASSNdOwrE
This tess
should yield fair values of washdown effectiveness even
“tough the twecs shicss seem to have received different amounts of fallout.
T@ masthead statics
mee
received similar treatment, i.e., no dome wash was
.
_#d on eithesr shis., and it is estimated from their data that YAG 39 re“@ived about 2.6 ti-mes as much contamination as YaG LO.
t t
As Wilized =n the
ro
LORRITE mete RYNIa ae re atiN ne se ARRAY
‘oe
100 hours,
The factor 1.6
zstimation of washdown effectivencss.
A znipwice average of washdown effectiveness on similar surfaces
az
a fiunctic— of ti-m2 is presented in Fig. 6.h-2.
COPIED/DOE
LANL RO”
QWs.
-A4-
‘ow
. control party seceiz—ng course instructions from a secondary control party