They were down at Majuro, 400 miles to the south,
UPTON:

The fish then continued to te more active

in the Rongelap area over the passage of years,
Right.

UPTON:
CONARD:

Yes,
And the fish were still quite active with

zine-65,

.
UPTON:

These are marine fish?

10

CONARD:

il

DONALDSON:

i2

UPTON:

13

CONARD:

14

FREMONT-SMITH:

15 ..

That was a three-year period up

until their return,

ww

on

ow

=

CONARD:

lagoon,

16

Yes,
There's no fresh®water,

The lagoon is a marine lagoon.

Yes,

It's salt water,
These are fish that stay in the

They were not going in and out of the ocean,
DONALDSON:

Both.

Both populations exist there,

17

The residual fish that Live in the lagoon are there but there's

18

also tuna fish that are used,

19
20

FREMONT-SMITH:

marily responsible for the increased body burden, do you know?

21
22
23
24

Which were the ones that were pri-

CONARD:

I really don't.

They ate all kinds of

fish.
FREMONT-SMITH:

I mean do you presume that the ocean

fish in that area still carried the heavy?

25

CONARD:

26

DONALDSON:

Lauren, it was maybe lagoon fish, wasn't it?
The ocean fish are essentially carnivores

27

and the lagoon fish are herbivores and you immediately fraction-

28

ate on this basis alone, that is, the food chain is different.

29

FREMONT-SMITH:

30

DONALDSON:

32

as if you dilute it,

32
33

And as you go up the thing looks again

FREMONT-SMITH:

responsible obviously.

Yes,

So it was the herbsivore that was

SEeeUCLA,
2

Select target paragraph3