-26- This issue should be recast from an estimation problem to a "define the boundary" problem. Healy: Has this been suggested to DNA? Barnes: Bair: I'm not in a position to do so. Would the Army be amenable? Barnes: Healy: Probably. The objective really is to locate the problem and get rid of it. Don't mess around with averages. Thompson: The answer is simple: Dig it up on Boken; Leave it on Enjebi. But this must be worded carefully. Barnes: There are two areas near the surface on Enjebi. Thompson: Healy: How do you word it carefully? The group has reviewed the issue of subsurface contamination and concluded that Op Plan is not operable for these situations: The material on Boken should be removed, The material on Enjebi should be left as is except to remove the asphalt. McCraw: Add that it's a very site specific problem and that we don't have enough information. Templeton: Thompson: The Op Plan is good for generic issues, but specific issue should be addressed on a case-by-case basis. Templeton: McCraw: *Bair: The Op Plan was written before the specific situations arose. What do the DOE field people say? Nothing. Requested Healy to work with Barnes to draft a recommendation to solve these problems and to address these problems and to address: the generic issue.