152 Health Physics qot pt Annual Doseto Adults (mGy) _| tt tt —*— Rongelap Island community —¥— Utrik community “— Kwajalein(S) |. _| August 2010, Volume 99, Number 2 received by the U.S. military weather observers who were stationed there and evacuated within 2 d of the detonation. The Rongerik dose is based on only a few survey meter measurements madeafter the evacuation by a survey team but agrees very well with reported external exposure measured by film badges worn by the personnel (35-98 R) (Sharp and Chapman 1957), particularly 10¥ \ a om 10° 107 1 0° (1930 to 1958), are presented in Table 6 for the Majuro FL . + y | t 1948 1950 1 al { 1955 t |—__ 1960 — } 1 4 — 1965 1970 Year of exposure Fig. 5. Estimated annual doses, in mGy, to adults of four population groups. Table 4. Estimates of external doses (mGy) received by adults from the Bravo test, the entire Castle (1954) test series, and from all tests (dose estimates rounded to two significant digits). Atoll or population group Ailinginae* Ailinglaplap Ailuk Arno Aur Bikini community” Ebon Enewetak community* Jaluit Kwajalein Lae Lib Island Likiep Majuro Maloelap Mejit Island Mili considering the considerable uncertainty in both sets of measurements and the fact that some of the military personnel were indoorsat least part of the time. Whole-body absorbed doses (mGy) from external irradiation, cumulated over the time period from 1948 through 1970, for representative persons by birth year Namorik Namu Rongelap control group* Rongelap Island community* Rongerik® Ujae Utrik community* Wotho Wotje Castle series All tests 460 0.37 470 5.3 470 6.9 2.3 3.3 1.1 0.71 2.1 9.3 77 5.0 4.8 14 10 9.9 14 5.3 25 15 7.8 22 10 Bravo 37 1.1 1.0 1.6 0.7 25 2.2 5.1 27 1.8 0.70 0.73 8.4 1,600 940 1.0 110 4.3 17 37 4.8 11 37 59 6.6 12 39 8.7 11 47 9.8 12 49 4.4 9.0 17 1,600 — 6.4 130 13 30 5.5 11 22 1,600 — 8.6 130 23 31 6.4 7.0 “Includes doses received while relocated (see Table 3 in Simon et al. 2010a). > Includes doses while on Kwajalein and Kili (see Table 3 in Simonetal. 2010a). “Includes doses while on Majuro and on Rongelap Island. “Dose to U.S. military personnel on Rongerik prior to evacuation (see Table 3 in Simonet al. 2010a). residents, the Kwajalein residents, the Utrik community, and the Rongelap Island community. As noted, doses for Utrik and Rongelap Island communities account for relocations. For a given population, the cumulative doses are greater for persons who were young at the beginning of the testing period. The radionuclides that contributed most to the dose rate from external irradiation vary according to the time elapsed since the detonation. These contributions can readily be derived from the tables prepared by Hicks (1984), as the relative exposure rates are providedforall radionuclides for a range of times after detonation. As an example, the changing proportions of the external dose rate contributed by some of the most important contributing radionuclides to external exposure are shown in Fig. 6 for the Bravo test and an assumedrelative degree of fractionation, R/V, of 0.5. In Fig. 6, '’Te is the most important radionuclide within a few hoursafter thetest, but is replaced successively by '°Ba-'°La, Zr, and finally by '*’Cs. Expressed in percentage of total exposure (averaged over a range of degrees of fractionation), '?Te-'*T accounts for about 25-30%, '*°Ba-'°La about 20%, 1 + 131 + '*I about 15-20%, and *Zr-”’Nb + 'Zr-'Nb about 10-15%. The exact percentages at any atoll and following any particular test also depend on fractionation with greater relative contributions from Zr-Nb isotopes for larger R/V values. Although '°’Cs and '°Ru contribute little to the total integral dose from TOA to 1970, they contribute almost all the annual dose after 5 y. All together, the deposition densities of 63 of the radionuclides listed in Simonetal. (2010a, Table 4) have been estimated at each inhabited atoll or reef island following each of the 20 tests. These radionuclides combined contribute more than 95% of the external dose. The proportions of the total exposure contributed from the individual radionuclides shownin Fig. 6 are actually