Table ic,
HASL #
Fallout data for May 1956 rain water collections.
Site #
383k
3835
1
1
3836
3838
6
3640
36)
8
9
3839
Total
Activity*
(me/mi?/mo)
West Newton, Mass.
West Newton, Mass.
2
3837
Sampling
Site
amp’ ing
220
130
Medford, Ore.
21 “* 2,3
‘Tampa, Fla.
Ly 1.9
&zores
7
+ 2.5
#1.3
110
Hatteras, N. C.
+3
4.3 + 1.2
Charleston, S. C,
Greenville, S.C.
5.6 #1.1
Te7 + O09
38h2
10
West Palm Beach, Fla, 23
#11
38h5
15
Lake Charles, La.
ll
+1.1
3847
3818
21
2,
Red Bluff, Cal.
Jacksonville, Fla.
17.
20
#1.1
#1.2
Burlington, Vt.
1k
+ 14
Montoursville, Pa.
dkron, Ohio
16
39
#101
+ 3.9
28
= 3.8
3843
11
3846
Tallahassee, Fla,
17.
3849
‘Nashville, Tenn.
25
3850
3851
3852
8.1714
26
27.
28
5.2 + 1.6
Nantucket, Mass,
Caribou, Me.
Albany, N. Y.
ae
Lf. _-
0.55 + 0.023
1.2 40,19
33
0
3.4 + 0.28
0.21 # 0.18
10.0 + 3.8
0.77 ¥ 0.15
0.85 + 0.13
0,86 + 0.11
1.1 + 0.11
1h + 023
ll #021
0.63 * 0,20
19
1.8 #0.30
3858
3859
47?
59
Bismark, N. D.
Fresno, Cal.
13
25
#1.6
41.2
1.2 + 0.17
ll * 0.17
3861
61
Scottsdluff, Neb.
15
+ 2.8
1.5 4 0.35
3863
63
3860
3862
386),
3865
Grand Island, Web.
60
Roanoke, Va.
62
Yakima, Wash,
~
8.1 + 0.7
13
Tatoosh Island, Wash,
66
67
Stephenville, Newf,
Laredo, Texas
41.6
5.4 + 0,62
7.6 + 0.80
2
17.
41.3
¥ 2.3
6.9
0.6
2.9
9.5
10
Madison, Wis;
4)
58
1.1 # 0.13
2.4 + 0.57
32
3857
0
2.0
17
1.5 + 0.17
1.1 40,12
1,1 # 0.12
2h
0.96
0,81 > 0.17
23 #1,2
9.0 + 0,6
22 *1.0
3856
Indianapolis, Ind.
0
11
0
Vy
29
30
31
926
1.4 + 0.18
1.0 # 0.17
3853
385)
3855
Sr
(me/mi</mo)
3.1 40.56
0.56 + 0,095
0.59 + 0.17
0.52 4 0.10
O49 + 0.099
1.9 #0.18
5.1 * 0.38
6.6
5.7
11
18
5.0
18
8.5
5.2
21
11
Q
2.9
9.0
0
% Total “ Activity Combing Date: dugost 23, 1956,
2& Sr°9 extrapolated to first day of sampling month,
» & =
4
o
=
~~
~
~
SARS
~ ~s
“
ad
She,
aes