52 5. DISCUSSION The report conclusions are from AND RECOHHENDATIONS (a) quite soil reached and the The straightforward. and issues vegetation raised dose externally, by received and (b) the is from body due the of to this radiations food eaten. /’---) The review The whole-body theirs; has rem. dose for (DOE-1982 shown the and red marrow are that erestimated now reported ours) I conclude thaf’DOE-l it well (1.25 is 40% below a return rem, to 30-year) (1.34 the the is rem). current residence 1978 one-half Both U.S. P la adultise. sets of values whole-body on Rongelap /7 of guide Island of 5 is permissible. (The later, 5.1 doses would be Living about the report are for The 1978. current dose, 10 years 20% less.) simple conditions leaving in former one (a) purchased as (b) Special this Assumptions Within that in on return 1985. and when In particular, thus the much money Food on should should supply addition, Assistance be the be the was ship would return the meet food consumed The In statement in Program, diet part available should raised at received which tacit to those be equivalent assumptions. prior to to the conditions. locally, regular now as but several equivalent following visited families are intervals. was available foods has but only also I assume then. distributed one was by the more year to USDA go.