34 4.2 Internal Dose ~ Lawrence into - Livernore body by ingestion the applying appropriate in The particular rem. precisely what To be i.e., one factors it on the involving food (Note it commented that the in fact it was more overestimation dose of calculations The 1978 pigs 1981a, and of 98 fish, In 1986, analyzed independently. smaller available?) et represented a person and in agreement the coconut, on 1988), the Naidu in food al in the and per day), and then to obtain the dose Table diet--no also (1980) 4.2 #1. one knows eat. a greater not This Livermore input who originally prepared, could activities (Robison contributing given lies The Lawrence specific 1982b). remarkable are . went eaten group described food, results of and that in that used it for concurred. made on 21 samples -2 diet dose. used (exposure) what attempts have been made to define several .—. —....—_ ~—”” -—.-2-. /-’‘WE-1982 chose the BNL community B diet, 11). than input ‘\ / amount of a greater by determining (picocuries uncertainty side, contaminated such I have although safe problem inhalation to ones is, the and The major Ingestion. it. attacked major independent for the measured 5 of whole 1987 this Pandanus, a barely however, the results, the Livermore of number took in data and reasonably (Expand 1 chicken, (Robison some Table cesium were additional collected summarized (?) team breadfruit, adequate also exposure confirmation. Livermore 1 of Laboratory project The part by the on this good al, samples which 4.2 the et #2, were show foods agreement when more data for P2 $A 4