RESULTS
Body Burden Data and Urine Activity Concentrations
The average body~burden data for adults since their return to Rongelap and
Utirik Atolls are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

‘In these tables,

the zero day or

day of return for Utirik was nearly 1,000 days prior to the zero day or day of
return for Rongelap. Directly measured body burdens were listed for 606, 6575
and 13765,

For 137 6, an initial rise in body burden and a subsequent general

decline was apparent.

These data were plotted in Fig. 2 along with their stan-

dard deviation and standard error.
Conversion of adult average 055 and 239, urine activity-concentration
data was done as indicated in the methods section in order to derive a body

burden for these nuclides.

Average data were listed in Tables 1 and 2 and

plotted in the case of 90. (see Fig. 3).
obtained from Beasley (Be72).

The body burdens listed for 5356 were

The methods used to derive 5556 body burdens

from blood measurements were given in Be72.

The most recent whole-body counting data available (1981) are presented in
Table 3.

Analysis of the data indicated that 1376, adult average body burdens

at Rongelap and Utirik were from 40 to 90 times greater than those of a compari-

son population at Majuro, a southern atoll which received little fallout from

testing (Le80c).

The 40, levels and corresponding potassium content were in

close agreement with naturally occurring values developed from data in ICRP 23
(ICRP74).

Due to the paucity of early measurements of activity in Utirik residents
0
.
(see Table 2), their 6 Co, 2395, and Fe body burdens were estimated by
comparing nuclide ratios for Utirik and Rongelap residents.

The measured body

burdens for these nuclides in Rongelap residents and the observed atoll-to-atoll
12

Select target paragraph3