agencies at an interagency meeting on September 7, 1972, as follows: AEC-radiological survey and cleanup and rehabilitation criteria; Defense (through DNA) - cleanup; and DOI - rehabilitation and resettlement. EPA opted not to become involved formally, but agreed to advise and assist. During September 1972 to March 1974, AEC * conducted an extensive radiological survey. A Task Group was established to evaluate —the survey results and to prepare recommendations for cleanupand rehabilitation. The Task Group report was coordinated with DNA, DOI, and EPA, SECY 74-542, Outline of a Staff Paper on Enewetak Atoll, was discussed with the Commission at Session 74-74 on April 23, 1974. The Commission generally accepted the proposed staff rationale which would allow the people to occupy part of the Atoll with certain practical restrictions on living sites, food sources, etc. This is consistent with the staff position that exposures should be ''as low as practicable" and based on conservative interpretation of Federal Radiation Council (FRC) guidelines. The Task Group report is available in the Secretariat and is summarized in Appendix 2. Key conclusions and recommendations are as follows: (1) FRC guides ror whole body, bone, and gonads for the iadividual, onc the philosopny oi Aiternative (3) snouid be used to evaniace predicted radiation doses. Owing to uncertainties in dose estimates, the values used to evaluate cleanup alternatives were the FRC guides reduced by 50 percent for annual dosesto individuals and by 20 percent for the 30-year gonadal doses. Thus: risen —_