be
inconsistent
high levels
w
+
wae ey
mar buy
function was
a7t
oy
information was
te
tke
certain
.mo
.
s.aents
“inally,
.2
if
*
Jr
ir
tn
extrem
was accidentalli.
Secondly,
r
tig
prevailed, wners
Committee
oh}
ve
the Comm:
with future whyr..
A
opposed to the Nava
answered by 0).
The
net
no
the
whether
.
\
of the opirio:
effectscf
examination
ct
t}
ae
%
[
aeypeeLy
there
tee
h
tant
stg
.
bomcetver
|
;
rt
be
yor
the
er
»
r
fet
bO14d91
ommitter
at ae
cmouja
wend)
to
hast
.PAG
ac
f 2
ye
tah
he
EAE
:
o by
LY
r
.
perenne
‘
a
ratizat
euc’
meh
yoy
atte
would then have bee:
indicate that
?
,
delive
have had clover
of
,
ay
effort
question of ¢tatist
is
ey
Con
incidence
these
oh
wey
Comm. tte:
intensive
mrnepothaor
ee
nae
both
7
~
ares
1
sf
gage
*
1
:
kines
¢
e
eros