transuranics in environmental soils is lacking.
on transuranic chemistry

Although the literature

in soils was not discussed, many of the papers

reviewed either hypothesized, concluded, or in isolated cases measured
the fact that plutonium had migrated into the soils and probably was
in particulate form, either as plutonium oxide particles, hydrated plutonium oxide colloids, or plutonium particles aggregated to soil parti-

cles.

particles.

However, the migration of plutonium as soluble complexes,

or in conjunction with soil particles also occurs to a sufficient degree, and some plutonium does migrate rapidly and to great depths, as
evidenced by the ground water study at Enewetak.

Close examination of many of the published profiles indicates that the
true front of plutonium migration was not observed due either to inThe

sufficient depth of sampling or inadequate detection capability.

Even

though the plutonium distributions

in soil

are quite variable,

there has been an attempt at a rough categorization.
It appears that
irrespective of the source, plutonium profiles in soil can be categorized

into three groups:

normal,

disturbed,

and abnormal.

Normal profiles exhibit no obvious profile development and the plutonium
distribution appears

to reflect a complex exponential

function.

This

type of profile is more likely to be associated with an undisturbed soil.
Only a limited number of observed plutonium profiles can be categorized
as normal.

The disturbed plutonium profiles result from activities associated with
construction, burrowing animals, water and wind erosion, and redeposition after the initial deposition of plutonium,
The plutonium distributions

in these disturbed soils are quite varied.

a uniform distribution of plutonium with depth,
samples were collected,

as was

They might show

that is,

as deep as

found on beaches and open areas of

implication is that a small amount of plutonium may have migrated to

greater depths than those measured.

The few inferences that can be drawn from observations of the duration
of migration suggest that for a short period of time after deposition
onto soil there

is a rapid penetration of plutonium into the soil.

In-

dications are that a smal) amount of plutonium moves rapidly, and to
some depth, into the soil as though the plutonium were complexed and
relatively uneffected by the attractive forces of soil particles. For
large concentrations of freshly deposited plutonium this effect may
ultimately present a significant environmental hazard.

Studies

should

be conducted to assess the magnitude of the possible mechanisms involved.

The turnover rate of fallout plutonium has been calculated to be 5-6
years for each 5 cm of depth giving rise to the exponential depth proinfiles in undisturbed soils. This observation appears to be somewhat
dependent of the total rainfall of the area.

Enewetak and Bikini Atolls, or in a desert wash area where runoff from
intermittent but severe rainstorms actively mix the top layers of
material.

Many of the early scil profiles were collected by coring techniques

Abnormal plutonium distributions are generally unexplainable and a

problem was recognized and much of the later work used techniques (such
variable.
as the "trench method") which provided some control over that

series of hypotheses have been used to suggest the possible mechanisms
responsible for individual observed distributions.

These possibilities

range from faulty analyses of some fraction (or fractions) to unidentified mechanical disturbances, to the physical and chemical interactions of plutonium with the soil constituents.
Understanding of the
abnormal distributions may be a key
chemical

predicting
which may have introduced a cross-contamination variable,
However, this
higher-than-real concentrations of plutonium at depth,

the coring
One cannot argue at this point with definitive data that
remains
method is faulty, only that the variable does exist and
unanswered.

to describing the physical and/or

interactions effective in the redistribution of plutonium or

transuranic nuclides within soils.

For

instance,

the accumulation of

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Plutonium in specific soil zones which are related to soil forming
factors,
nized.

such as A and B horizons or carbonate
The filtering action of

specific soil

lenses,
horizons

has been recogfor small

colloids containing plutonium or plutonium particles, and the potentially
different chemistry among the
factors

zones,

for plutonium migration rates

may be the long term governing
in soils.

The authors are aware

of no study currently in progress to address these problem areas.

The authors wish to thank Mr.

T.

Ensminger,

Early in the history of plutonium distribution studies, it was thought
that plutonium was so tightly bound to soil, that plutonium could not
penetrate into

the soil

in the short time that has elapsed since

first introduction into the soil.

of soluble

ionic plutonium since

its

This may be true for the migration

it may be

70

tightly bound by

Oak Ridge National Labora-

tory (ORNL) for his assistance in querying the Nevada Applied Ecology
on of
Information Data Base, for references dealing with the distributi
‘
transuranic nuclides in soils.

soil

71

Select target paragraph3