IN “deception” but explicitis dene to supply electric power hit sibly because tney igncre ine! raw materials’ are convevte .1'- tute the basis for the prouucricr on June 5, however, severaiS competition from atomic naus’ may have been intendec tc forest ‘the quest for atomic incusiri.«a Soviet propaganda, sug} end of May lest the US proceed poo and blame the USSR ‘or ia behind the power plant an ounce - appears to be littse more har « families) suggests that it .6 su‘! ment. Conceivabiv, itis niena ultimately to be incorpora e: Moscow has differe a tn for agomestic and foreign augienc in glowing terms of changes (ur of energy" making “unnecessars people generally emphasized the the West in terms designer tr f. an eariy .miprovement in b ving UN Insarmarn.ent Taiks in restricted sess101.in Lon ton | full Commission, confirmed tna’ armament in Soviet thinking ine review the report of irs Sun-Cor report to the UN Genera Assent seriously to discuss einer a 1S an international contre. curpan or the stages in a disarmament prog + REPRODUCED AT THE OWIGHT, D. ™ ~ BISENHOWER LIBRARY . Sing what ittermed its nes’ us hese proposals provided for vm ‘appeals for banning the use i product ishing ‘control’ (. ¢ inspector. “hird within a vear cf signa ure» on foreign ierritcry as wel. as! a hey relate to these .ssues8 tre tanued to form tne basis tor tre velaxation of tensbiir De a UNGEASSIFI ED

Select target paragraph3