Table 7.

Results of serum analyses in exposed Marshallese subjects

with at least two TSH assays >6 W/ml (1980).

Sub ject
No. & sex

Date of
sample

Serum TSH
(W/m)

3M
5M
4M

1977
1963
1972

69
500
6.0

2.5
0.5
7.3

1969
1979
1974
1979
1974
1977
1977
1979
1980

6.3
6.5
6.3
8.3
10
7
6.6
8.8
7.3

4.4
4.9
7.1
8.0
4.2
5.2
6.1
7.6
5.1

16M
34F
71F
78F
32M

1974

Serum Ty,
(Ue/d1)

7.9

Normal control range:

0-6.0

Age at
exposure

Estimated
thyroid dose
(rads)

0.95
0.71
--

l
1
38

1150
1150
335

0.89
0.91
-0.74
-0.98
0.82
0.68
0.89

39

135

4&5

335

27

335

37

335

3

1050

TBGI
(units)

5.4

0.82

5.0-10.2

0.85-1.10

observation of elevated TSH in the individuals listed in Table 7 cannot be
attributed to age alone. No. 4 and No. 78 were among those in whom TSH stimulation tests had been performed earlier. Both had Ty, increments of “1 Ug/dl
24 hours following 10 units TSH administration, a clearly subnormal response

showing that these thyroids had no capacity to respond to increased demand.
To evaluate the pituitary/thyroid axis more completely, TRH studies were
done in some individuals. Results on subjects No. 4, 71, and 78 are given in

Figure 5.
Data from subject No. 74, discussed below, are also shown.
This patient had surgery subsequent to the test and is therefore categorized separately (Table 8).
Subjects No. 4, 71, and 78 all were hyperresponsive to TRH
stimulation, with serum TSH values at 20 min >22 WU/ml, which is the 97.5% con-

fidence interval for mean normal responses in the Marshallese.
90.

.

40;

i

‘

1

Figure 5.

Basal plasma TSH and TRH-

=r 78 fo
a
¢ 20+

stimulated TSH in euthyroid Marshallese
and in four exposed subjects with
biochemical evidence of impaired thy-

* 0b

20 min after infusion of 500 Ug TRH.
The upper limits of the normal range

4

tot

Or
ao aTane

.

.

roid function.

*

Plasma was obtained

are indicated by the shaded bars.

-~72-

Select target paragraph3