for a specific badge, the exposure of the film badge during the period it was in the mess hall (H+28.75 to H+35.25) must be added to the calculated film badge dose as of H+28.75 hours. This "mess hall dose" is approximately 12 rem. From the personnel interviews it is possible to calculate the H+28.75 film badge dose for two of the film badges whose readings are given in Table 2 (badge #311 and #312). In addition, it is possible to calculate the H+28.75 hour dose for the badge that was hung on the tent post in the Army area (badge #314). Table 3 compares the calculated film badge dose at H+35.25 hours (the calculated dose at H+28.75 hours plus the "mess hall dose") and the corresponding film badge reading (from Table 2) for these three film badges. The activity scenarios or protection factors pertinent to the other badges are insufficiently known to permit meaningful comparisons. Table 3. Comparison of dosimetry results with doses calculated to film badges. Film Calculated Dose (QH+28.75 hrs Calculated Dose (QH+35.25 hrs Film Badge Badge CN Reading (Table 2) Ratio 311 416 32 rem 44 rem 40 rem 1.10 312 4ii 38 50 uu 1.14 314 N/A 100 112 98 1.14 From Table 3, the calculated dose to a specific film badge at H+35.25 hours is approximately 10-14 percent higher than the actual film badge reading. This difference between the calculated doses and the film badge readings could easily be accounted for in the uncertainties associated with defining the free-field radiation environment and protection factors on Rongerik. Thus, the estimated doses in Table 1 -are conservatively reduced by 10 percent in order to be consistent with the dosimetry results. This adjustment in the Table 1 doses yields the best estimates of film badge doses received by the personnel on Rongerik. Results are presented in Section 5. 15