CHAPTER IV, SECTIONS 4 and 5
Returned to the U.S. Navy after OPER-

period the services of the LSD were made avail-

ATION IVY

able for hull repairs. On completion of the op-

erations at Bikini all the craft were returned to

1 - LCU
29 - YC Barges (wooden)
6 - LCMs

Eniwetok, where major overhaul was scheduled.

Maintenance facilities at Eniwetok consisted primarily of the engine repair shop, DUKW
shop, electrical and injector shop, the hull repair yard, and a Gilhoist and floating dry dock.
These were adequate. Water Taxis and LCMs

Received from the U.S. Navy for OPERATION CASTLE
4 - LCUs
5 - LCMs
2 - YC Barges (steel)

were beached for major repairs; tugs, LCUs and

barges were dry-docked. Figure 4-34 shows an
LCU in thefloating dry-dock.

To be ‘retuned
CASTLE

The H&N marine repair group was called
upon during this Operation for servicing and
maintenance on craft under the control of and

OPERATION

1 - YTL (wooden)
4 - LCUs
1 - AFDL-5. (To be returned to Jobsite after dry docking).

operated by other Task Units. This work was
accomplished under Job IV work orders.

Received from the U. S. Army

All items of maintenance work performed

6 - Army type 585-ton barges - four of
these were expended for Scientific
purposes.
15 - DUKWs. One expended and surveyed.

on each craft were recorded in a maintenance

history. A record of dry dock operations indi-

cated that the AFDL-5 was used for 31 dockings
during the period from January 1953 through

April 1954.

Returned to the U.S. Army

EXCHANGE OF CRAFT.The terms and conditions that apply to loans of marine craft by
the Navy Department to the Atomic Energy
Commission is outlined in the Joint AEC - Department of the Navy agreement OPNAV 4000
10 A (7/1/53). In accordance with this agreement, joint inspections were made on all exchanges effected for this Operation. The reports
of these inspections were furnished the AEC
Resident Engineer, and copies were retained in
the Contractor’s files for future use in adjudication of costs. The following are the exchanges
effected during this operation:

15 - DUKWs.
A comparison of costs of major overhaul of
LCMsby the Navy and the Jobsite was made.
The Jobsite costs were actual costs incurred, and
the Navy costs were those estimated for work
on LCMsreturned to the Pear! Harbor Navy
Yard after OPERATION IVY. This comparison
is indicated below.
Based on this comparison, all LCMshereafter will be retained at the Jobsite after completion of an operation, and the boats will be
owerhauled by Jobsite forces and mothballed on
the site.

NAVY YARD
A-boat
B-boat
Hull
Machinery

after

$9,362.00
3,287.00

$9,576.00
3,287.00

C-boat

JOBSITE
D-boat

$4,910.00
4,665.00

$5,240.00
4,665.00

SECTION 5

AIR TRANSPORTATION
Interatoll air transportation for the move-

ment of personnel, mail and urgently-needed

called for two flights per week, but were increased as the tempo of the work increased,

of PBMs until 30 January 1953. On this date
the landing field on Peter-Oboe was placed in
use and thereafter flights of C-47 type planes
were regularly scheduled. At first the schedules

during periods in which the airfield at Bikini
could not be used, PBMs were again provided

materials and supplies was provided by means

reaching a peak in 1954 of four flights per day
six days a week. In March and April of 1954,

to furnish this support. Passenger scheduling
Page 4-47

Select target paragraph3