CHAPTERIII, SECTION 6
cant resided in the local area for at least the
last ten years. The “QE” also was based upon
the results of a local and sometimes a national
check by agencies. Both types of clearances were
strictly temporary, and the prior approval of
the Field Manager, Eniwetok Field Office, had
to be secured before processing could be started.
Simultaneously with the request for either the
Local “P” or the “QE” Clearance, a formal request was madefor the conventional “P” or ‘“‘Q.”
Where the applicant had previously been granted a “Q” Clearance with another activity and
his “Q” Clearance had lapsed, a “Q” Reinstatement was requested.
At the inception of OPERATION CASTLE,
each employee was required to have at least a
“Pp” Approval before he was authorized to enter
the Pacific Proving Ground. During May, 1953,
the Eniwetok Field Office notified Holmes &
Narver that, subsequent to 1 January 1954, no
individual would be allowed to enter the Pacific
Proving Ground nor remain at the PPG without
a “Q” Clearance. To plan for compliance with
this directive, it was decided that requests for
“Q” Clearances should be made prior to 1 September 1953 for employees who would be at the
Pacific Proving Ground subsequent to the cutoff date. Accordingly in only a few instances of
emergency were individuals allowed to proceed

to the PPG after 1 September 1953 if they had

not been placed in process for a “Q’’ Clearance

prior to that date.

All security papers necessary for obtaining
clearances were submitted to the Atomic Energy
Commission’s Los Angeles Security Branch.
Prior to the submission of security papers each
applicant was screened from a professional and
character standpoint to determine his eligibility
for further processing. This screening was accomplished not only by contacting previous employers

and

personal

references,

but

also

by

utilizing two national private investigative agencies. As a result of information received from
these sources, approximately 11% of the applicants were removed from security processing.

Information obtained from local law enforcement
and Federal Agencies in the area was helpful
in weeding out those individuals who could not

meet established security requirements. Of the
4,293 requests for “P” Approvals, 2,979 were
granted; of the 4,288 requests for “Q’” Clearances, 1,329 were granted. Of the 450 requests
for “Q’’ Reinstatements, 444. were received; 425

requests for Local “P’’ Approvals were requested and received. The average time required for
AEC processing of “P” Approvals was 36.03
days; for ‘“‘Q” Clearances, 101.72 days; for “Q”

Reinstatements, 18.82 days; and for Local “P”
Approvals, 4.5 days.

A meeting was held 9 April 1953, attended
by representatives of the H&N Security Department, AEC Security representatives from the

Santa Fe Operations Office, and from the AEC

Los Angeles Security Branch, wherein it was
decided that all clearances would be cancelled
by the AEC Los Angeles Security Branch ninety
days after the date of granting unless the individual had been placed on the Holmes & Narver payroll by that time. A similar provision
pertained to terminating employees; their clearances lapsed unless they were re-hired within
ninety days. In order to affect this procedure
a form was prepared for each hired applicant,
setting forth the individual's full name, his AEC
number, his next of kin and address of next
of kin, and the individual’s type of clearance.

This form was transmitted to the AEC Los
Angeles Security Branch, the Eniwetok Field
Office Security Representative at the Pacific
Proving Ground, and the Eniwetok Field Office,
Albuquerque, New Mexico. The form served
not only to notify all concerned that H&N was
employing the applicant, but also to notify the
Department of State of the overseas travel of
an individual. Upon hiring of an individual,
either in the Home Office or at Jobsite, his
clearance status was made known to his super-

visor.

Entry into the Pacific Proving Ground was

controlled by the Commander-in Chief of the
Pacific Fleet, and in order to gain entry, an
individual had to be certified as a good security
risk. The Port Control Director, Long Beach
Naval Station, was the Military representative
authorized to sign all overseas identification
cards andall travel orders for individuals traveling to the Pacific Proving Ground.
In May 1953, when H&N was advised that
any employees who would be at the Pacific
Proving Ground subsequent to 1 January 1954
would require a “Q’” clearance, the Security
Department requested the AEC to commence
processing applicants for “‘Q”’ clearances. However, requests for “Q” clearance processing on
applicants was suspended until “P” approvals
were received, thus precluding a costly “Q”
clearance processing on those individuals who
would not be granted a ““P” approval.
It was decided that all employees signing
one year contracts after 1 June 1953 would
be placed in process for “Q” clearances. By 15
June 1953, the Jobsite had selected those “P”
approved personnel who were desired after the
“cut-off” date, and they were placed in process
for “Q” clearances. After 15 August 1953, all
applicants whose services were required after
the ‘“‘cut-off’ date were placed in process for

a “QP” clearance.

The date 1 September 1953 had been es-

tablished early in the Operation as the “limiting
date,” after which an individual normally could
not proceed to the Pacific Proving Ground unless he was in process for a ‘“Q” clearance.
Changes in the planning during August 1953

Page 3-33

Select target paragraph3