TABLE 2
STRONTIUM-89 CONCENTRATIONS AND CONTRIBUTION
OF FRESH STRONTIUM-90 FROM ATMOSPHERIC TESTS
Theore tical ¢
111
Measured
1.6
74
49
ND
0.8
30
60
90
lll
74
39
2.9
1.7
0.3
60
91
66.16,1964)
Dec.
Jan.1965
ND
16 + 3
nese 2
yy 14,1965)
t
June 1965
July
August
57.9 + 2.7
28.2 + 2.6
2.4 + 1.1
1.5 41.2
120
nese #3
June 1966
13.1 + 2.8
37
100
1.8
4.3 + 0.8
1.8 + 0.7
108
139
38
25
1.7
0.9
18.7 + 1.7
19
129
86
5.3
19
AY
81
112
142
173
129
86
55
36
24
16
7.0
5.3
9.9
8.5
4.5
2.0
:
y 9, 1966)
lese #4
Sept.
July
August
Sept.
Nov. 1966
1627, 1966) Dec.
ese #5
Jan. 1967
+» 27,1966) Feb.
larch
April
May
June
10.4 + 1.7
6.5 + 0.8
11.9
15.5
27.4
34.7
14.0
5.3
+
+
+
+
+
+
1.2
1.1
1.6
1.6
1.8
0.9
67
49
33
67
0.4
2.2
8.5
ese #6
No evidence of 89Sr in August or September 1967.
217,1967) July sample lost and September through December sampling
or analytical ambiguities occurred.
ise #7
24,1967)
b
Jan. 1968
Feb,
March
April
May
June
e #8
Feb. 1969
28, 1968)
counting error,
ot determined.
6.5 + 0.6
18.3
14.8
13.1
3.1
+
+
t+
+
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.7
22
53
81
111
141
2.9 + 0.7
172
2.3 + 0.5
48
124
81
55
36
24
5.8
7.2
5.1
3.4
1.3
16
0.9
87
2.2
90g.
From Test (°
1.5
1.6
NOW OH
30
Ratio 90
Sr
to
12)
me DPR hy
10 + 3”
Sr
to £ lo ke
Jnese #1
Test (days)
39
Om in lo ©
Nov. 1964
Year
Time
Elapsed
Since
ho oN
8°5,
Concentration
(£C1/m3)
nan
Sample
Collected
Month and
.*
t
ad
ee
18
23
19
13