2p
2.2.4
Data
Resistance versus tine of the exposed I-ray detectors of Station TX-2$2
J:
is shown in Figs. 2.19 through 2.22.
‘Resistance wersus Cime of detectors 4) aod By ef Station TK-209 is shown
in Figs. 2.23 and 2.24.
Table 2.1.
The energy recieved by each detector is given in
Qne door seems to have been partially in the nose cone shadow.
Resistance versus time of che Station TK-252 a detector is shown in
Fig- 2.25.
2.2.3.
The rise in temperature prior to zero ix discussed in Section
Table 2.2 gives the energy received by each thermal detector.
Resistance versus time of Station TK-209 a is shown in Fig. 2.26.
The
energy received by each of the thermal detectors of Station 209 is given in
Table 2.2.
The resistance versus tine for thermal detector zy of Orange Station 1255S
is shown in Fig. 2.27.
The energy received by each thermal detector at Orange
Station 1255 is given in Table 2.2.
The instrument arrangement and the energy received by each detector (both
X-ray aod thersal) for Teak Sration 252 and Orange Station 1255S are shown in
Fig. 2.15.
2.2.5
Sucmary of Instriment Performance
The large error in burst-poiat positioning considerably exceeded sllos-
ances aade for positioning errors in the design of these instruments;
73
[a
pipes 79 threes }
°7 ave delated,
7¥