i
i

|

Marshallese children appears similar, on a risk per
rad basis, to that in the x-raved children studied
by Hempelmann. !97.109 Risk for thyroid cancer in
the Rongelap people is also similar to that reported for other populations.
The data in Table 25 indicate that at the dose
levels involved there ts a correlation between inci-

dence of thyroid lesions and the estimated dose to
the gland. Onthe basis of the incidence per rad in
the high exposure Rongelap children, about 2
children with adenomas would be expected in the
Ailingnae group, where ? were noted, and 4 in the
Uuirik group, where none was found. The lower
effectiveness per rad in the Utirik children maybe

Table 33

:

rw ee ne ee

‘
‘

29

Percent [Incidence of Thyroid Lesions (20 Years Observation)

Age at exposure
<€10 yr
Group

Benign

Rongelap

> 10 yr

Cancer

84.2

Ailingnae

33.3

X-raved children (17 yr)197

28.0

Rongelap & Ailingnae
Utirik

X-rayed children, low dose (17 yr)10?
Marshallese controls

3.3

0.0

United States}?

4.0
0.0

3.0

0.13

4.3

1.8 x 10-5 (all ages)

Ii

4.4

15.8
5.1

3.5
1.0

0.0

5.4

2.5 X 10-5 (all ages)

0.36-1.7

Cancer

33.3

76.0
0.0

1.0

Worldwide av.108

Benign

1.8 x 10-5 (all ages)

2.5 * 10-5 (all ages)

0.5-1.6

Table 34

Risk* of Radiation-Induced Thyroid Lesions (Cases per 108 man-years per rad)
Age at exposure

< 10 yr
Group(years follow-up)

Dose range, rads (type)

> 10 yr

Benign

Cancer

Dose range, rads

Benign

Cancer

379
135-190
327
31

10.5
16.1
‘225
89.2

7.0
0
6.4
17.8

Rongelap (20)
Ailingnae (20)
Rongelap & Ailingnae (20)
Uuirik (20)

710-1150 (18,7)
280— 450 (I, y)
280-1150 (18,y)
60- 95 (IB, y)

41.9
43.6
42.1

2.6
0
2.3
0

Rochester (17)197

335 (av.) (x rays)

64.0

3.5

Ann Arbor (17)!97

20 (av.) (x rays)

Beach & Dolphin (20)!3

(x rays)

UNSCEAR(17)!4

100- 300 (x rays)

ABCC (20)!91

20-1000 (y, 7)

ABCC (20)102

<20

(y,7)

24.0

2.2

1.7

0.5-15

1.3 (all ages)

0.2 (all ages)

*Risk is calculated from the equation
Risk = No.of cases x 106
~ dose x years at risk ’
or, alternatively,
.
No.of cases x 10
Risk =

‘

=

=“

oa

oo

.
°
a
28.

caetl

No. of subjects X mean dose x mean No.of years atrisk ™=.

Both equations give almost identical results for the Marshallese because of the uniformity of the data. No correction
has been madefor expected numberofcases because the expectation among unexposed subjects is too lowto affect the

results (see Table 33).

Select target paragraph3