fie
a
&
c
re}
Qs
ww
b>]
hte
ce
> a
ie)
©
ec
«A
@
+o
rr
s
™:
c,
my
K
U3
a
i)
.
y
te
>
QO
Oo
C3
Oo
a
i
S
a
gr
©
ty
Hy
pa
&
cb)
i
ew
In the ense of the plants, we tested for it by setting
ermine what maxinun
M
Q
e
©
oO
ct
p=
potential cne vould cvss have,
c
ww
3
eb
oO
by
fy
3
Q
eb
Qo
43
ts
cs
Bte
Q
8)
t .
0
3
q)
Yo
‘3
C3
Gi
foto
above any level thant would ever apmoaz din the river, and tien
Only the 155 rercent level indi-
cated to us possible elgaizicancs,
Determining tho setivity in
the seed hore, the act ivity an the seed, here is the ccntrol, or
you might say hackgrowud isvel, which would te normal to any
essentially the came.
The 5 porcent plot was
The 1 nercent nist
shaved a value of 2.8
a
uncontaninated prov
gxvowm
pm
in the area.
-
plus or minus .3 times 10 to minus 5, which is not even tulee tre
normal background level,
It is ecssontially nil.
to got a diffevence of this tyne.
It is very har
You just can't evaluate it,
and 1t is so low,
| With resp
nect to seed, yield likewise drops.
It is
intorcsting to note here that the seed yield here is rather
Gefinite,
.
Certainly when I compare 1t with thernount of radiation
that is present,
again, as Deetor Foster found, it seens to be
the chrouiun which is used in tho sro-reactor treatnent -- sinply
a standazd voller types presess trentrenat -- and this chreniva