we handed the ATC, ene part of that introduction boing on botany, one paxt Limnolosy and one part vortebrates. Wa included all of the other vericbratys included in the Lake except the ordinary We did not do anything on those, because we did not have 4 bircs. the time ov tho poopic. Ve did a little wort, hovaver, on amphibians, roptiles, mostly turtles, of which there is an abundance at White Oak Lake. We aiso dic somo work on watexs fowl Which is being continued, ard we Gid quite a bit on fish because that is what woe wont thore for Somo of tho results I can give you, I think, are pretty good evidonce that the vadietion accumulated to Which the fish were exposed in White Oak Lake shoved thera wore harmful effects. In the first place, from the best of our information which we could get fron ethsr Tennessea Valley lakes, the fish grew at @ rato of about 25 to 30 percent nore Slovly than these in the surrounding lakes, ‘Furthermore, those specics of fish had a life span of 30 to 40 percent, waich yas a shortor life, We must keep in mind that White O2k Lake was much more fertile than the other lakes, so the fish vrobably should have grown faster although ‘thoy may not have lived longer, because there is sone questicn as to whether a fast-living fish will live as long as a slov-. living fish, and so on, and I bolioeve there is some truth in that. By tho same token, fish that grow -- real fish -- get larse in