prior

to

then,

a

policy

framework

lacking and concluded that
"Over the
government

past
has

for

the

territories

several years,
the federal
attempted
to
rectify
many

pressing problems facing the territories.

Many

cases,

was

however,

the

piecemeal

In

solutions ~

devised have failed to clear up the underlying causes of those problems.
While some
federal
actions
have
contributed
to
the
development of the territories, others have
not promoted the greater self-sufficiency to
which they justly aspire."

Some

specific

implemented.

of

Territorial

initiatives

For example,
Affairs

was

in

the

policy

statement

were

the Department of-Interior's Office

reorganized

tant Secretary to provide a stronger
In addition, Interior was established

and

headed

by an Assis-

voice within Interior.
as the focal point for

political status discussions.
Most other initiatives were never
fully
carried
out,
including
multi-year
economic
planning,.
establishment of a federal laws commission, and full extension
of the Internal Revenue Code to the territories.
Since 1980, no comprehensive effort has been made to establish a more clearly defined and consistent policy for the terri-

tories.
Territory officials believe that federal relations with
the territories have improved but that policy direction is

lacking, particularly for economic development.
Many officials
believe federal policy is haphazardly applied to the territories
in such areas as federal laws, programs, and policies and that a

more comprehensive, defined approach is needed for the territories

to

develop

sufficient,

and

United States.

their

economies,

establish

(See ch.

5.)

a

become

more

more

permanent

financially

status

with

self-

the

CONCLUSION

The trend in political development of U.S. territories is
clearly toward greater self-government and responsibility for

local affairs.
Many of the territories continue to press for
clarification in their relationship with the federal government;

some, such as Guam are doing so through political status discus-

sions.
The terms of discussion focus heavily on economic and
. representation issues.
In addition, many territory officials
are calling for a more clearly defined federal policy to better
address their economic, political,
and social concerns.
As
noted in chapter 2, until the Congress chooses to exercise its

constitutional prerogative to establish an ultimate status for
the territories, it is likely that federal-territory relations
will continue to be ambiguous and somewhat contentious.

5000222

15

Select target paragraph3