the operational period. Li’c,tle or no “bilateral. planning and ccmrdinating activity was accomplished with CTG 7.2 whi,ch led to taim mmrh a cer~ of confusion in the initial stage of responsibility turn- over. 2s. The consolidated mess functioned well in consideration of available facilities but was not able tc handle efficiently the peak I load of 36OO with its present maximum seating capacity of 800. 26. All personnel onEN13u~TOK Island were adequately billeted though inaccurate pre-plmning fi~wes were submitted and a great deal cf subsequent space shifting was necessary aftxr all personnel arrived. One task grow~~requested, and received, officer space into which they placed enlisted persmnel. Another task group required much mm-e space than requested2’7. Intersemice friction amcng Air Force and Army mess personnel ymduced recurrent disciplinaryproblemg. This was traceclto the Air Force system of assigning permanent l<PIswhose efficiency~ morale and good humor dissclved snmewhat after spending several months on this unfavorable detail. 128