cases the work was not comnlctcd as scheduled thereby restricting maximum planned efficiency of the evcitual.facility user as well a% ‘..----.... r preventing contractor personnel from devoting needed time to mew day maintenance andutility opcratio~~ 8. 4 ~ I :arly constructtin progrms were hampered by a lack of coordination between ‘tonspot’]pcrscmcl~ AEC and Hq JTF SEVEN. This was greatly alleviated late in the build-up period when JTF SEUEE acquired a Staff Engineer who ccmncndabfi~wnitored and mpedited construction activitiye 9. The ~J61.T~111Lfiscc7J~c~us Construction Fund, based on experience factors gained durin~ an “titer-M.”year> proved insufficient to meet the needs cncmntcrcd in a build-up andoperatio~ year, 10. Facility maintenance and minor construction, to scvncdegree, was p~rf@rmed by TG ‘7.2without moper personnel, equipment and material. This channeled time and materials away from tasks implied in assigned missions and also proved uneeonofical over civilian omtractor accomplishment in view of the limited cmtribution the small Army section was able to make. U.. lluri~ power failures the number of emergency generators available on ENIWETOK was not m.fficient to prevent a certain loss of food or to allow proper functioning of the consolidated mess. N 12, The spare parts problem$ especial&y with respect to vehicles, was met throughout the operation~ however$ stock levels were frcqucntlymintained through the use of emergency requisitions only. A principle factor involved was the climatic in:rcss on spare parts I.